Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Alejandro-Martinez, et al v. Ortiz-Vazquez, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL L. ALEJANDRO-MARTINEZ, MARIA ANTONIA ORTIZ-SANTIAGO, BENJAMIN APONTE-DOMINGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, JOSE F. ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, COMPANIA DE AGUAS DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
United States of America v. Ortiz
as 1:2011mc91157
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Juan Ortiz
ORTIZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30581
Plaintiff:
CARLOS M. ORTIZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
R.C.J. Technical Group, Inc. vs. FDIC
as 3:2010cv02198
Defendant:
FDIC , Robert J. Pietri and Insurance Company A,B,C
Plaintiff:
R.C.J. Technical Group, Inc. , Carlos David Ortiz-Diaz , Janet Santiago-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ROSARIO-ORTIZ v. ZUCKERFOOSE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv06318
Petitioner:
CARLOS ROSARIO-ORTIZ
Respondent:
ZUCKERFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Alvaro Prado-Ortiz
as 09-51029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALVARO PRADO-ORTIZ, also known as Carlos Prado-Ortiz
Ortiz-Skerrett v. Rey Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01442
Plaintiff:
Carlos Javier Ortiz-Skerrett
Defendant:
Rey Enterprises, Inc., Reinaldo Torres-Rivera, Reinaldo Torres-Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1875 (d)(1) Protection of Juror's Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.