Cases 51 - 60 of 230
John Westine v. Charles Daniels
as 17-2678
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Billy Edwards v. Susana Martinez, et al
as 17-16544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY L. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor, State of New Mexico, ROMAN COLTER, FRANK PORTER and others
Collins, et al v. Daniel, et al
as 1:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Darlene Collins , Bail Bond Association of New Mexico , Richard Martinez and others
Defendant:
Charles W. Daniel , Edward L. Chavez , Petra Jimenez Maez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Cornett v. Charles Daniels
as 17-2229
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CORNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Christopher Cornett v. Charles Daniel
as 17-2136
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CORNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID ROYER
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
HSA:
A. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edwards et al v. Martinez et al
as 4:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Billy L Edwards, Continental First Star Communications Corporation of Utah, Continental First Star Communications Corporation of North Dakota and others
Defendant:
Susann Martinez, Roman Colter, Frank Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Hughes Burgest v. Charles A. Daniel
as 17-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL HUGHES BURGEST
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Lawrence Stevens v. Charles Daniel
as 17-1584
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
James Kornhardt v. Charles Daniel
as 17-1466
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES K. KORNHARDT
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
