Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Smith v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv02046
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Donald Kelchner, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Arcola Homestead Savings Bank v. Arete 3, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv05986
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Arcola Homestead Savings Bank
Defendant:
Arete 3, Ltd. and Charles E Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SMITH v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
as 2:2010cv60727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH JR.
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60622
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Five Star Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Favorite et al
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Five Star Enterprises, Inc., TDMC Enterprises, Inc. and Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Russell Favorite, Russell Favorite, Russell Favorite and others
Charles Smith v. Philip Vasquez
as 09-35870
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP VASQUEZ, Warden
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv00538
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GLOUCESTER COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. ICT GROUP
as 1:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
ICT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ChemStation International Inc. v. TDMC Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
ChemStation International Inc.
Defendant:
TDMC Enterprises, Inc., Charles E Smith and Douglas O. Smith
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
