Cases 51 - 60 of 132
Costanza v. Stockton et al
as 2:2018at01108
Plaintiff:
Marsha Costanza
Defendant:
City Of Stockton, CELENTANO, Weir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Agyeman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05320
Plaintiff:
Roberta Agyeman , Joseph Ameyaw , Edward Ahern and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Calvin Costanza, et al v. Accutrans, Incorporated
as 17-30996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN M. COSTANZA, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, B.C. and STACEY COSTANZA, Individually and on behalf of her minor son, B.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCUTRANS, INCORPORATED
Costanza v. Collins
as 1:2017cv11839
Plaintiff:
Pete Joseph Costanza
Defendant:
Joseph Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Costanza et al v. Accutrans, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05706
Plaintiff:
Calvin M. Costanza and Stacey Costanza
Defendant:
Accutrans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gwendolyn Hall v. Katherine Kinsey, et al
as 17-55345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE KINSEY, TARA MULAY, JEAN M. COSTANZA and others
PAFFEN v. THE PHOENIX GROUP et al
as 2:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
GLENN PAFFEN
Defendant:
THE PHOENIX GROUP, PHOENIX LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY, INNOVATION PRINTING & LITHOGRAPHY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Costanza v. Norwegian Cruise Line as owners of the M/V PRIDE OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv10344
Plaintiff:
Christopher Costanza
Defendant:
Norwegian Cruise Line as owners of the M/V PRIDE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv17670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Costanza et al v. Jefferson et al
as 2:2016cv17668
Plaintiff:
Katherine P. Costanza
Defendant:
Parish Jefferson, Jefferson Parish Personnel Department, Jefferson Parish Department of Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
