Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Crocs, Inc et al v.Christine Holifield et al
as 2:2014cv04298
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc and Snyder Investment Management LLC
Defendant:
Does, Elite Aviation Holdings II LLC and Christine Holifield
Witlin v. Jibbitz LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01287
Plaintiff:
Brian Witlin
Defendant:
Jibbitz LLC and Crocs Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
eDekka LLC v. Crocs, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00418
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
E2E Processing Inc v. Crocs Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
E2E Processing Inc
Defendant:
Crocs Inc and Crocs Retail LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Celebrity International, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08054
Plaintiff:
Celebrity International, Inc.
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. and Sock & Accessory Brands Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Polliwalks, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11425
Plaintiff:
Polliwalks, Inc.
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. and Kohl's Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
UbiComm LLC v. Crocs Inc.
as 1:2013cv00873
Plaintiff:
UbiComm LLC
Defendant:
Crocs Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Crocs, Inc. v. Leyden et al
as 5:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
Jerry Leyden and Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. , Oriental Trading Company, Inc. , Saks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
