Cases 51 - 60 of 139
Reed v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Reed
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mike Rallings, J. Perea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murrell v. Zeon et al
as 4:2018cv00921
Plaintiff:
Getzell Johnson Murrell
Defendant:
Zane Young Zeon, Stephanie Michelle Oliver, Jacklyn Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pacione et al
as 1:2018cv01446
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Pacione, Surane, Selby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wells v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Damon D. Wells
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wells et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02506
Plaintiff:
Lauren D. Wells and Sharon Wells
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv06245
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, DM Rodriguez, A. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv05245
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Aaron Acevedo, Joseph Angarone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gregg-El v. John Doe
as 17-6493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGG-EL, a/k/a Charles Gregg
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Health Services Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. WHITED, RNCB; Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. SANDIFER, Institutional Ombudsman; Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017md02775
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
