Cases 51 - 60 of 147
Antoine Moseley v. Daniel Clarke
as 19-2778
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTOINE MOSELEY
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff:
Charles W Armour
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Davis v. Prosecutor Blake Badston, et al
as 19-2904
Defendant:
Prosecutor Kim Davis, Judge Gary Arnold, Officer Ryan Childers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry David Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Prosecutor Daniel Odell Turner, Lt. Detective Brian Daniel, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Prosecutor Blake Badston and others
HUGHES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03070
Plaintiff:
JAMALL RIDEAUX, BRANDON DALCOURT, ROBERT PHILLIPS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jamall Rideaux, Brandon Dalcourt, Robert Phillips and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLARK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00183
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Pie Pepper Bakery Company et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Dr John Doe #1 and Pie Pepper Bakery Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Berryhill
as 0:2018cv02695
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Alisha Pate, et al v. Rodney Tow, et al
as 18-20518
Appellant:
ALISHA PATE and YVONNE CLARK-THIGPEN
Appellee:
RODNEY D. TOW, Trustee and DANIEL CLARK, IV
Gabry v. State Farm FCU et al
as 1:2018cv03099
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gerald Gabry
Defendant:
State Farm FCU, Daniel Clark, Kesha Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
