Cases 51 - 60 of 69
United States v. Mario Smith
as 11-1621
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Mario Darnell Smith
Smith v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv01372
Plaintiff:
Cory Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States v. Mario Smith
as 10-3454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Mario Darnell Smith
Smith v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Cory Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCVAY v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62659
Plaintiff:
LARRY DARNELL SMITH
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010cv03073
Plaintiff:
Tony Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Van Racy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Calvin Green
as 10-6210
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN BERNARD GREEN, a/k/a Aaron O. Smith, Jr., a/k/a Calvin M. Green, a/k/a Calvin D. Smith, a/k/a Calvin Marvin Smith, a/k/a Calvin Darnell Green, a/k/a Budda Smith, a/k/a Calvin Darnell Smith, a/k/a William Mingo Johnson
Smith v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2009cv04101
Petitioner:
Tony Darnell Smith
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
US v. Calvin Green
as 09-7723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN BERNARD GREEN, a/k/a Aaron O. Smith, Jr., a/k/a Calvin M. Green, a/k/a Calvin D. Smith, a/k/a Calvin Marvin Smith, a/k/a Calvin Darnell Green, a/k/a Budda Smith, a/k/a Calvin Darnell Smith, a/k/a William Mingo Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
