Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 205
No Casino in Plymouth, et al v. National Indian Gaming Commission, et al
as 22-15756
Plaintiff / Appellant: NO CASINO IN PLYMOUTH, DUEWARD W. CRANFORD II, ELIDA A. MALICK and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, JONODEV CHAUDHURI, Former NIGC Chairman, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: IONE BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
Wyoming Gun Owners v. Buchanon, et al
as 22-8021
Plaintiff / Appellant: WYOMING GUN OWNERS, a Wyoming nonprofit corporation, AKA WyGO
Defendant / Appellee: EDWARD BUCHANON, in his official capacity as Wyoming Secretary of State, BRIDGET HILL, in her official capacity as Wyoming Attorney General, KAI SCHON, individually and in his official capacity as Wyoming Secretary of State Election Division Director and others
Wyoming Gun Owners v. Buchanon, et al
as 22-8019
Plaintiff / Appellee: WYOMING GUN OWNERS, a Wyoming nonprofit corporation, AKA WyGO
Defendant / Appellant: EDWARD BUCHANON, in his official capacity as Wyoming Secretary of State, BRIDGET HILL, in her official capacity as Wyoming Attorney General, KAI SCHON, individually and in his official capacity as Wyoming Secretary of State Election Division Director and others
David Meyers v. Todd Ishee
as 22-6462
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Respondent / Appellee: TODD E. ISHEE, NCDPS Prisons Director, DENISE JACKSON, PRESCOTT WILLIAMS and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee: GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Corey Greene v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 22-6273
Plaintiff / Appellant: COREY D. GREENE
Defendant / Appellee: KENNETH LASSITER, Director of Prisons, NCDPS, in his individual capacity and official capacity, TIM MOOSE, Chief Deputy Secretary, NCDPS, in his individual capacity and official capacity, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prisons, NCDPS, in his individual capacity and official capacity and others
Alfonso Pew v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1250
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFONSO PERCY PEW, AKA Sehu-Kessa-Saa Tabansi
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, Executive Deputy Secretary of Corrections, TABB BICKELL, Regional Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Defendant: DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KERI MOORE, Grievance Officer, DR. NOEL PALAKURC, Medical Doctor and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
Miriam Fultz, et al v. AFSCME, et al
as 22-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: MIRIAM FULTZ
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, Council 13, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL NEWSOME, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Office of Administration and others
Bradley Barlow v. Service Employees Internationa, et al
as 21-3096
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRADLEY BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 668, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, BRIAN T. LYMAN, in his official capacities as Chief Accounting Officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Deputy Secretary for the Office of Comptroller Operations and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?