Cases 51 - 60 of 388
Garcia v. Coombs et al
as 4:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Z. Garcia
Defendant:
David W. Coombs, Jr. and Jacob P. Betsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 8:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Defendant:
Rosalyn Cotton, Mark T. Langan, Robert Twiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Mackay v. Cotant et al
as 8:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
David A. Jackson-Mackay
Defendant:
Vonnie Cotant, Michael Dedinsky, Julie White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IsoNova Technologies, LLC v. OvaInnovations, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
IsoNova Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
OvaInnovations, LLC and David L Rettig
Interested Party:
C.J. Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ravestein v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Douglas County, Nebraska, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ravestein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berkland et al v. Remmers et al
as 4:2021cv03171
Plaintiff:
Dennis Berkland and Terre Berkland
Defendant:
David C. Remmers and Kinzie Remmers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blackmore v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
David E. Blackmore
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gardner v. Franklin et al
as 4:2021cv03145
Plaintiff:
Glenda Sue Gardner and David Gardner
Defendant:
Frederick D. Franklin, Donald W. Kleine, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Due v. USA
as 8:2021cv00218
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
