Cases 51 - 60 of 248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01166
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 21-7235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL MANIS, D. ANDERSON, C. KING and others
BACCAIRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55095
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRY BACCAIRE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Doyle Const v. First Standard
as 21-30442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Doyle Construction, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
First Standard Asurety, L.L.P. and David Harris
USA v. David Harris
as 21-5792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID HARRIS
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Carl Manis, Officer M. Woodard, Sergeant Mr. Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priest et al v. Harris et al
as 7:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mary Eleanor Priest and James Harold Priest
Defendant:
Brandon David Harris and Big Fam Enterprises, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co, Erie Insurance Exchange and Erie Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv10141
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
