Cases 51 - 60 of 85
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00809
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Navy and Christopher Rommel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Strahan v. Roughead, et al
as 14-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
Muhammad v. Department of Navy et al
as 1:2014cv01290
Defendant:
Department of Navy and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Charles Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00926
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ragar v. Carroll et al
as 4:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Ragar
Defendant:
Casey L. Carroll and Department of Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hamdy Abou-Hussein v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 13-5251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hamdy Alex Abou-Hussein
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Navy and Naval Criminal Investigative Services, Unknown Agents
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
