Cases 51 - 60 of 993
Guo v. Does 1-181, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Shaojia Guo
Defendant:
Does 1-181, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 1 ANGGREK-Store-US, Doe 2 chenxingyusm and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ladarious Downs v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Ladarious Downs
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Los Angeles County Long Beach CA, Los Angeles County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hilton v. Caringi et al
as 9:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
James D. Hilton
Defendant:
Caringi, Mahan, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
J Smith, . Durbin, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Defendant:
BEN WATKINS, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Braithwaite v. Suffolk County New York
as 23-108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keston Braithwaite
Defendant / Appellee:
State of New York, Suffolk County Correctional Facility, Errol D. Toulon, Jr., Sheriff of Suffolk County and others
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
