Cases 51 - 60 of 1,974
Singleton v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Elijah Singleton
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Robert May, Tasha Hollingsworth, Lt. Daum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Dotson et al v. CG Roxane LLC
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Tom M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC and CG Roxane LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Christopher Lumpkin v. VDOC Director Dotson
as 24-6275
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR CHADWICK DOTSON, SUSSEX I STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, MS. CARTER, Head of All Medical Departments of Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Yeats v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
