Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Nelson v. City of Stamford
as 12-817
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nelson
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Stamford, Brent B. Larrabee, Chief, Stamford, Ind, Francis Cronin, Lt, Stamford, Ind, AKA Frank and others
Nelson v. City of Stamford
as 12-771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Nelson and Patricia Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Stamford, Brent B. Larrabee, Chief, Stamford, Ind, Francis Cronin, Lt, Stamford, Ind, AKA Frank and others
Nelson v. Stamford et al
as 3:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Edward Nelson
Defendant:
City of Stamford , Thomas J. Scanlon , Kevin Fitzgibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2011cv07020
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NELSON and GRETCHEN FLINT-NELSON
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NELSON v. WEBER
as 1:2011cv03500
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NELSON
Defendant:
THERESA WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Deerfield Empire, L.L.C.
as 0:2010cv61814
Plaintiff:
Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Deerfield Empire, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nelson v. Dickinsen et al
as 2:2010cv02156
Plaintiff:
Dyke Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinsen, Y Cheng, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv01287
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steinberg v. 375 Park Ave. LP, et al
as 0:2004cv60899
Plaintiff:
Marty Steinberg
Defendant:
375 Park Ave. LP, Alford, S.A., Alpha Fifth Group and others
Receiver:
Marty Steinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Dyke Nelson v. Department of Correction
as 10-55082
Petitioner - Appellant:
DYKE EDWARD NELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
