Cases 51 - 60 of 1,269
John Demos, Jr. v. Alex Gorsky, et al
as 22-35515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX GORSKY, CEO, Johnson & Johnson, JOHN STUMPF, CEO, Wells Fargo and LARRY PAGE, CEO, Google Inc.
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 3:2022cv03102
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 2:2022mc50916
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Togail Technologies Ltd. v. Google Inc.
as 6:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Togail Technologies Ltd.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Anthony Weimer v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 22-35246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER and ANTHONY C. WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware limited liability company and GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Said v. Wray et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
Mody Said
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Pichai Sundararajan, Dan Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Google Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09819
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ceaser Lewis
Defendant:
Google Inc. and Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taebel v. Google Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Google Inc and Youtube LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.