Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Wright El v. Downs et al
as 2:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
James U. Downs, Graham County, Wanda Brooms and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright El v. Downs et al
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
James U. Downs, Graham County Clerk of Court, Graham County and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ferguson v. Graham County Superior Court
as 4:2010cv00525
Petitioner:
Kenneth K Ferguson
Respondent:
Graham County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adrian et al v. Graham County et al
as 4:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ray Cervantez , Adeline Adrian and Estate of Valarie Cervantez
Defendant:
Graham, County of , Preston J Allred , Robert Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Signorelli v. Graham County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Signorelli
Defendant:
Graham County Sheriffs Office, Arizona Department of Corrections, Dora Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Denton et al v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Denton and Ginger Denton
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Health Services Department, Neil Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
