Cases 51 - 60 of 111
Rodriguez et al v. Burlington Insurance Company et al
as 7:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Rodriguez and Alicia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Burlington Insurance Company and Abercrombie, Simmons & Gillette, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campos et al v. Personnel Staffing Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv10554
Plaintiff:
Jose Campos, Julio Campos, Victor Lopez and others
Defendant:
Personnel Staffing Group, LLC doing business as MVP, MVP Workforce, LLC and W2 Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez et al v. Bayer
as 3:2015cv03566
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Rodriguez , Juan Hernandez-Reza , Andres Hernandez-Reza and others
Defendant:
Wesley Bayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Protective Insurance Company et al
as 7:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Company and Deena Denise Olivares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Rodriguez-Mendoza v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-12017
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc., v. Cotto Torres et al
as 3:2014cv01339
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc.,
Defendant:
Dellanira Cotto-Torres and Hector Ivan Guadalupe-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
J & J Sport Productions, Inc., v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2013cv05470
Plaintiff:
J & J Sport Productions, Inc.,
Defendant:
Himelda Rodriguez and J. Guadalupe Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Maria Rodriguez De Islas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73692
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ DE ISLAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Rodriguez Mora v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73411
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ MORA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
