Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Burgos v. Beane et al
as 9:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Miguel Burgos
Defendant:
Beane, Wilson, Rhoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUZON v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2015cv06809
Plaintiff:
DONNELL N. MOUZON
Defendant:
ROBERT T. DOUGHERTY, JR., MATTHEW HUNGERFORD and CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hungerford et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 2:2015cv02754
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Margaret Hungerford and Christopher Hungerford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hungerford et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01905
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hungerford and Laurie Hungerford
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNGERFORD v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00093
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM P CERVONE and MARY E DAVIS
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WAYNE HUNGERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hungerford v. Gainesville Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Hungerford
Defendant:
Gainesville Police Department, Mary E. David and William P. Cervone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Travers et al
as 9:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hungerford Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Vicki Miller
Defendant:
Hungerford Properties, LLC, Capitol Association Management, LLC, Levin, Powers & Brennan, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brooks v. Creahan et al
as 9:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Charles Brooks
Defendant:
Emmet Creahan, Michael Hogan, Richard P. Miraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hungerford v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marion E. Hungerford
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
