Cases 51 - 60 of 123
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EVERETT
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN CALVIN EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Neuendorf #147980 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv04176
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald J Trump, Unknown Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuendorf #147980 v. Greggs et al
as 2:2017cv04036
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
Unknown Greggs, Unknown Jones, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuendorf #147980 v. Mattis
as 2:2017cv03844
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
James Mattis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuendorf #147980 v. Stein et al
as 2:2017cv03456
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
John Stein and Kirt Hughs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson Davis v. USA
as 17-12871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMERSON DAVIS, a.k.a. Mercy, a.k.a. John Calvin, a.k.a. Dred, a.k.a. Stanford Robinson
Mayo v. Capps et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Eggleston et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, Dana Horn Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Neuendorf, II v. Unknown Party, et al
as 17-15388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN NEUENDORF II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as: Dentist, a Black Doctor at Tempe Hospital, UNKNOWN SUMI, named as: Sumi Unknown, Technician II/X Ray Tech at Tempe Hospital, RICHARD PRATT and others
John Everett v. USA
as 17-10251
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN EVERETT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
