Cases 51 - 60 of 335
Poirier v. Bakkt Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Poirier
Defendant:
Bakkt Holdings, Inc. f/k/a VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings, John Martin, Olibia Stamatoglou and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Spaulding v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
John Martin Spaulding
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin #286103 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 3:2022cv08059
Petitioner:
Philip John Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Nickolus John Martin
Defendant:
Travis Santez Jones, Unknown Jones, US Auto Transport Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin #286103 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 3:2022cv08014
Petitioner:
Philip John Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Evans and David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINOUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARTINOUS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
