Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Annis Lloyd v. Lachlan MacNeish
as 15-6587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
LACHLAN MACNEISH, MARTIN J. ADAMS, KENNETH SARVIS and others
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, A. R. FALES, JR., G. D. JOHNSON and others
Charles Samuel Miller v. D Schumacher et al
as 2:2015cv01333
Defendant:
M A Buechter, M A Buechter, A Lugo and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Miller
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joanna K Marshall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Lee Gleason Jr. v. L. Franklin et al
as 2:2013cv07015
Defendant:
M. A. Buechter, M. A. Buechter, L. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr
Lopez v. Whitmore et al
as 9:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Edgardo L. Lopez
Defendant:
N. Whitmore, K. Marshall, W. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Saenz v. M. Spearman, et al
as 13-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GONZALEZ SAENZ
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SPEARMAN, D. REEVES, Sgt., C. HUDSON, Appeals Coordinator and others
Hill v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 4:2013cv40048
Plaintiff:
Mark V. Hill
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, Maria L. Angeles, Linda Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv12154
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Peter A Pepper. Jr, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv06272
Plaintiff:
Robin J. Murray
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service and Shane K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
