Cases 51 - 60 of 105
Aman Singh v. Adam Gegare, et al
as 15-3639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMAN SINGH
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM GEGARE, JEREMY GLOUDEMANS, sued as Lt. Gloudamanz, LISA AVILA, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karpinski Trucking and Produce, Inc v. DAMCO, Inc
as 1:2014cv09940
Plaintiff:
Karpinski Trucking and Produce, Inc
Defendant:
DAMCO, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
KARPINSKI v. LUNN
as 2:2014cv05601
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KARPINSKI
Defendant:
JEANNE M. LUNN, ROSE REDDEN and CHI RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADSHAW v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv05583
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, GEORGE ONDREJK, SUE KARPINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard et al v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2014cv13465
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Beard, Jr. and Johnette Ford
Defendant:
Eric Hawkins, Jeffrey Tinsman, Jason Schneider and others
Singh v. Gegare et al
as 2:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
Aman Singh
Defendant:
Adam Gegare, Lt Gloudamanz, Lisa Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv02689
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ M. BOWENS
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETEL, KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
Sean Kendrick
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, John Paquin, Jay Aldana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karpinski v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02052
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mary M Karpinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
