Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07155
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WINSLOW v. EXTRA SPACE STORAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv04858
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WINSLOW
Defendant:
EXTRA SPACE STORAGE, INC., EXTRA SPACE MANAGEMENT, INC., STORAGE PARTNERS OF PAOLI, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sivak v. Munger et al
as 1:2026cv00439
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
J. Munger, State of Idaho, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ball et al v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv07100
Plaintiff:
Kim Ann Ball and Rasier- CA, LLC
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sutterfield et al v. Lowes Home Center, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv02038
Plaintiff:
Kim Sutterfield and Nancy Sutterfield
Defendant:
Lowes Home Center, LLC and M&C Assemblies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
KIM v. VELAZQUEZ et al
as 2:2026cv04819
Plaintiff:
NARI KIM
Defendant:
WALDERMAR VELAZQUEZ and METROPOLITAN WAREHOUSE & DELIVERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
