Cases 51 - 60 of 281
Marcum et al v. Dixon et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Michael L. Dixon, Randall Robinson doing business as Randy's Towing, Randall Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
John Marcum, Julie Marcum and Cecil Marcum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Klein v. Leschly et al
as 1:2021cv00279
Defendant:
Mark Vachon, Nick Leschly, Daniel S. Lynch and others
Nominal Defendant:
bluebird bio, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blanche Dixon, et al v. Federal National Mortgage, et al
as 21-10204
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER D. BLANC, in his official capacity and individual capacity as a retired 15th Judicial Circuit Court Judge, SHARON R. BOCK, in her official capacity as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY J. DIXON and BLANCHE L. DIXON
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Danny Dixon
as 20-3285
Defendant / Appellant:
DANNY L. DIXON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pruitt et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv07272
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Cummins, Joseph F. Reece, Patrice Marie Pimentel and others
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Kaiser Permanente International, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Warden
as 3:2020cv05846
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Damon L. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79763
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VYRON L DIXON III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Faust et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Bradly, N Faust and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
