Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Nash v. Carlson et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
James L. Nash
Defendant:
Mary Carlson and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert L Nash v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00246
Petitioner:
Robert L Nash
Respondent:
Teamsters Local 396 and United Parcel Service Inc
USA v. Alex Nash
as 12-10056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEX L NASH
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2011cv02530
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
NASH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv53706
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. NASH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Nash v. Shaver
as 3:2011cv05696
Petitioner:
Keith L Nash
Respondent:
Tony Shaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NASH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2011cv03409
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. NASH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, GREG BARTOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Dennis Berg and others
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
NASH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64996
Plaintiff:
HEZEKIAH L NASH and ESSIE M NASH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons et al v. Sabine River Authority et al
as 2:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jeff Simmons , Alice Simmons , Jeannie Simmons and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority , Linda Curtis-Sparks , Entergy Gulf States Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
