Cases 51 - 60 of 188
Harden v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2017cv03095
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Robert Clayton Hicks, Matt Kuhse, Aimee Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ke v. Smith
as 3:2017cv03855
Plaintiff:
Hui Lian Ke
Defendant:
Laurie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06293
Plaintiff:
Lauri Smith
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cramer v. Smith
as 3:2017cv03697
Petitioner:
James A. Cramer
Respondent:
Laurie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ke v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv01687
Plaintiff:
Hui Lian Ke
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Laurie Smith, Kamala D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ke v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv01688
Plaintiff:
Hui Lian Ke
Defendant:
Kip Davis, Edmund G. Brown and Laurie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Ortega v. Mark Ritchie, et al
as 17-15497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS ARMANDO ORTEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RITCHIE, M.D., AMARJIT GREWAL, M.D., BEVERLY PURDY, Santa Clara County Jail Physician and others
Cristela Maxson v. Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2017cv01293
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office, Richard M Alanis, Daniel Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Cristela Maxson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Kopf et al
as 8:2017cv00015
Defendant:
All Federal District Court Judges, All Supreme Court Judges, Richard G. Kopf and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaujayam Ali El Yahsu v. The Warrant #N337211 et al
as 5:2016cv06623
Plaintiff:
King Romano RA Pharaoh Beaujayam Ali El Yahsu
Defendant:
The Warrant #N337211, The Arrest #N337211, Fenoy Affidavit #16-271-0367T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
