Cases 51 - 60 of 183
David Alexander v. USA, et al
as 13-15024
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Alexander v. Gorsuch et al
as 1:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Keith Gorsuch and Thomas A Cordle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Alford et al
as 1:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Darren Wallace and David Pille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Alexander v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01312
Petitioner:
David Lee Alexander
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander, et al v. Alford et al
as 1:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell Alexander and Ronald Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Darren Wallace and David Pille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Alexander v. Gary Johnson, et al
as 12-40344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LEE ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division and PAULA FOY, Mark W. Stiles Unit Mailroom Supervisor
Norman v. Alexander et al
as 1:2011cv01331
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Norman
Defendant:
Lee Alexander and Steve Woodcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv24340
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Broussard
as 1:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Ina M Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
