Cases 51 - 60 of 692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gardina v. M&T Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00888
Defendant:
Mr. Cooper Group also known as Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Community Loan Servicing doing business as Nationstar Mortgage, M&T Bank, Quality Loan Services and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Steven Gardina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
DUFF et al v. M&T BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DUFF, BEVERLY DUFFY and MICHAEL F. DUFFY, SR.
Defendant:
M&T BANK and LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Charmaine Custis v. Alisa Graves, et al
as 23-1692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARMAINE CUSTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISA GRAVES, District/Area Manager, M&T BANK, AARON EVANS, Vice President/Branch Manager and others
M&T Bank v. Casper et al
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
M&T Bank
Defendant:
Bernadette Casper, David Dale and Northwest Savings Bank
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
M&T BANK v. CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
M&T BANK v. HAN et al
as 2:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
KYUNG WHA HAN, PNC BANK, N.A., CITI BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
LANE et al v. M&T BANK
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
JASON LANE and RUTH RENAE LANE
Defendant:
M&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
