Cases 51 - 60 of 209
Torres v. TDCJ
as 3:2019cv00549
Plaintiff:
Juan M Torres
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Garcia v. Tseng, et al
as 19-15252
Defendant:
C. HEATH, PEREZ, V. VALLERY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TSENG, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY GARCIA
Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01398
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Angel M Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jesus M. Torres v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv08956
Plaintiff:
Jesus M. Torres
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee on behalf of Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2017-1 v. Torres et al
as 3:2018cv01623
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee on behalf of Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2017-1 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Hector M Torres, Edith Pastrana and Conjugal Partnership Torres-Pastrana
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Andrews v. Sapp et al
as 5:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Corey LeSohn Andrews
Defendant:
FNU Sapp, M Torres, FNU Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Garcia v. C. Heath, et al
as 18-15560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
C. HEATH, M. MENDOZA, E. BRADLEY and others
BRIDGES v. TORRES, JR.
as 1:2017cv07107
Plaintiff:
MARY BRIDGES
Defendant:
JOSE M TORRES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Torres
Defendant:
City of New York, City of New York Department of Corrections, Rikers Island and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv04808
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
