Cases 51 - 60 of 914
POSEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21040
Plaintiff:
MARQUES POSEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYD v. WARE STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
BOYD v. WARE STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Marquis Johnson
as 23-4461
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS JOHNSON, a/k/a Marques, a/k/a Marty
BOYD v. JACKSON ST et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
JACKSON ST, GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United States v. Marques Armstrong, Jr.
as 23-2432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marques Dwell Armstrong, Jr., also known as Kease
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
