Cases 51 - 60 of 907
Mike Webb v. Department of the Army, et al
as 22-5292
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mike Webb, Major, doing business as Friends for Mike Webb, also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of the Army, Defense Intelligence Agency, Merit Systems Protection Board and others
BIT, LLC v. Department of the Navy et al
as 5:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
BIT, LLC
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command, Naval Surface Warfare Center and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Pirkkala v. MSPB
as 22-1941
Petitioner:
STEVEN P. PIRKKALA
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Limbrick v. MSPB
as 22-1922
Petitioner:
LAURA A. LIMBRICK
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army, et al
as 22-5150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Esparraguera
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of the Army, Secretary of the Army, Under Secretary of the Army and others
Michelle C. Honse v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 8:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Michelle C. Honse
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Xunxian Liu v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al
as 22-5122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xunxian Liu
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Director of Merit Systems Protection Board and Attorney General of Department of Justice
ESPARRAGUERA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 1:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
MARIA ESPARRAGUERA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, UNDER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
