Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Klein et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv21390
Defendant:
Eli Lilly Industries, Inc.,, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raquel Klein, Michael Klein and Michael W. Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Schools District No. 32 et al
as 4:2017cv05010
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Michael Klein, Scottsbluff Public Schools District No. 32 and Scott's Bluff Country Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Schools District No. 32 et al
as 7:2017cv05010
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Michael Klein, Scottsbluff Public Schools District No. 32 and Scott's Bluff Country Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03748
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Ward , James Abbott , Victor Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
