Cases 51 - 60 of 103
In Re: Rule 45 Subpoena issued to Sofer & Haroun regarding Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2013mc00100
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp.
In Re:
Rule 45 Subpoena issued to Sofer & Haroun regarding Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Walker Digital, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2012mc00092
Plaintiff:
Walker Digital LLC
Defendant:
Google Inc, Microsoft Corp and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Tom Arbino v. Microsoft Corp
as 12-4087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM ARBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORP
Walker Digital, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2012mc00091
Plaintiff:
Walker Digital, Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc, Microsoft Corp and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
InNova Patent Licensing, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
as 2:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
InNova Patent Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Microsoft Corp v. DP Electronic Recycling Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00520
Defendant:
DP Electronic Recycling Inc and Dale Helgeson
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corp
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Elia Data of Texas, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
as 2:2012cv00184
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp
Plaintiff:
Elia Data of Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Microsoft Corp. et al v. John Does 1-39
as 1:2012cv01335
Plaintiff:
FS-ISAC, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and National Automated Clearinghouse Association
Defendant:
John Does 1-39
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kinbook v. Microsoft Corp
as 12-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KINBOOK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORP
USA v. The account identified as "diuie@hotmail.com" maintained by Microsoft Corp., located at 1065 La Avenida, Bldg. 4, Mountain View, CA 94043
as 2:2011mj02552
Defendant:
The account identified as "diuie@hotmail.com" maintained by Microsoft Corp., located at 1065 La Avenida, Bldg. 4, Mountain View, CA 94043 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
