Cases 51 - 60 of 224
Badger v. Cain
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Moses Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan v. Melton et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Corey Melton, Baker, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silverman v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Julius Silverman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
James David Cochran
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Everett v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 22-1670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Everett
Defendant / Appellee:
Moses Jackson, Warden, NCU, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Dusten Foster and others
Phillips v. Straughn et al
as 3:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
William Straughn, Moses Jackson and Joe Paige
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Higgins et al
as 4:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Steven Vann
Defendant:
Higgins, Moses Jackson, Dexster Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Hastings v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 21-2084
Defendant / Appellee:
Justine M. Minor, Disciplinary Officer, ADC, Bruse D. Sanders, Chief of Security, ADC, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven R. Hastings
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Payne et al
as 3:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Walker, Leslie Rutledge and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
