Cases 51 - 60 of 520
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Carvana, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dianne K. Parker
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC and Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Malik v. Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator et al
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Akeem Alin-Nafis Abdullah-Malik and Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator, FNU Parker, Sheriff Eddie Cathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. USA
as 7:2021cv00212
Petitioner:
Jamar Ke-Shawn Parker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
