Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 327
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 20-1182
Petitioner: MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Southwestern Public Service Company v. Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant: Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Public Service Company of Colorado v. United States of America, Department of the Army
as 1:2020cv00725
Defendant: United States of America and United States of America, Department of the Army
Plaintiff: Public Service Company of Colorado and Public Service Company of Colorado doing business as Xcel Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Public Service Company of Colorado v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00726
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Public Service Company of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
NextEra Engy Captl Holdings, et al v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 20-50160
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION SOUTHWEST, L.L.C., LONE STAR TRANSMISSION, L.L.C., NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER SHELLY BOTKIN, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity, CHAIRMAN DEANN T. WALKER, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity and COMMISSIONER ARTHUR C. D'ANDREA, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae: LSP TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS II, L.L.C., TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS, ENTERGY TEXAS, INCORPORATED and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00317
Defendant: Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission and OGE Energy Corp.
Intervenor: Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Interested Party: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alliant Energy, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Petitioner: NRG Energy, Inc., The Southern Company, DTE Energy Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Texas Municipal Power Agency and Western Coal Traffic League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff: WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00104
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00076
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er
Great Divide Wind Farm 2, et al v. Aguilar, et al
as 19-2214
Defendant / Appellee: CYNTHIA HALL, VALERIE ESPINOZA, STEPHEN FISCHMANN, in their official capacities as the Commissioners of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREAT DIVIDE WIND FARM 3 LLC, a Delaware corporation and GREAT DIVIDE WIND FARM 2 LLC, a Delaware Corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?