Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Raymond Garcia v. J. McClaskey
as 17-6108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND GARCIA, a/k/a Freddie Andaya
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE J. P. MCCLASKEY, DET. CITY OF CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE K. CHILDERS, DETECTIVE R. GONSALEZ and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE UVALDO RIOS, CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA, ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
HAWKINS v. ROWAN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv01272
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JERRON LEE HAWKINS
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY JAIL, ANDREW COCHRAN and HACKL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORE v. THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01262
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, HAND and MARIA BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davi
as 16-6412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM DAVIS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Rowan County Clerk
FIORE v. CRADDOCK et al
as 1:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
HANNA CRADDUCK and THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORE v. HANNOLD et al
as 1:2016cv00917
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
HANNOLD, MAKEY and ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBLE v. CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2016cv00513
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF, JASON S. THOMAS, ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2016cv00490
Petitioner:
GALEN LEE SMITH
Respondent:
ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIORE v. DESMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
SGT. DESMOND and THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2016cv00303
Petitioner:
GALEN LEE SMITH
Respondent:
ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
