Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Deborah Roquemore et al
as 5:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Deborah Roquemore and Rick Roquemore
Bacon et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Waine Bacon , Jimmie Browner , Jeffrey Chase and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Derezic et al v. Ohio Department of Education et al
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Aimee Derezic , Jeffrey Pesek , Michelle Roquemore and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Education and Richard A. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southern Financial Group, LLC et al v. Laurel Canyon Golf, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Southern Financial Group, LLC
Defendant:
Laurel Canyon Golf, LLC, William A. Roquemore, Jr. and Pamela A. Roquemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandra M Johnson v. State of California, et al.,
as 5:2013cv02306
Respondent:
Canine Support Team, Carol Roquemore and State of California
Petitioner:
Sandra M. Johnson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. State of California, et al.,
as 3:2013cv04409
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Johnson
Defendant:
State of California, Canine Support Team and Carol Roquemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
