Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Mario Garcia-Solorzano v. Loretta E. Lynch
as 16-1021
Petitioner:
Mario Garcia-Solorzano, also known as Sergio Garcia
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch
Garcia-Rivas v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv01083
Movant:
Sergio Garcia-Rivas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez v. Mi Barrio Meat Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07475
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garcia Lopez
Defendant:
Mi Barrio Meat Market, Inc., Francisco Zuniga and George Portoreal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michelis v. United States of America - Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2015cv08060
Plaintiff:
Carlo S. Michelis
Defendant:
United States of America - Secretary of Housing and Urban Development , Chicago Real Estate Leaders, LLC, Tomi Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
USA v. Sergio Garcia-Hernandez
as 15-10878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SERGIO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Sergio Armendaris Garcia, also known as Serjio Hernandez Garcia, Sergio Elias Garcia-Hernandez
Garcia v. Williams
as 1:2015cv04412
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garcia
Defendant:
Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Officer Matthew Hudak et al
as 1:2015cv01393
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garcia
Defendant:
Matthew Hudak, Terrance O'Brien, Pamon Mir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia et al v. Young et al
as 0:2014cv06994
Plaintiff:
Elder Aragon and Sergio Garcia
Defendant:
Michael Degen, Leo Young and Young's Wood Finishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia et al v. Young et al
as 2:2014cv06994
Plaintiff:
Elder Aragon and Sergio Garcia
Defendant:
Michael Degen, Leo Young and Young's Wood Finishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thomas v. Garcia
as 3:2014cv02265
Plaintiff:
Relius Thomas
Defendant:
Sergio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
