Cases 51 - 60 of 729
Kim Rogers v. Katherine Lester, et al
as 23-15193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE LESTER, Sacramento Police Chief, K. SIMMONS, #693, P. FONG, #3015 and others
(PS) Aderholt v. Edwards et al
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aderholt
Defendant:
Ann Edwards, Phil Serna and Rich Desmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Serna v. Andrade
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Antonio Serna
Defendant:
FNU Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serna v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Maria Serna
Defendant:
Unknown Party named as John Doe Corporation, an Arizona company doing business as Mi Lindo Michoacan The Mexican Corral, Jesus Enrique Olvera Gasca and Unknown Gasca
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
U-Haul Co of Arizona v. Wynne et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Defendant:
Elem Wynne, III, Kennedy Davis, B. M., Minor and others
Interpleader:
U-Haul Co. of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Serna Peralta v. Portocarrero Rios
as 6:2023cv00010
Petitioner:
Diana Maria Serna Peralta
Respondent:
Cristian Portocarrero Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Serna v. Webster et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Mike R. Serna
Defendant:
David Webster and Margarette Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. William Serna
as 23-10034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM JOEL SERNA
Norberto Serna v. David Holbrook, et al
as 23-15095
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORBERTO SERNA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary
Kim Rogers v. Katherine Lester, et al
as 22-16878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE LESTER, Sacramento Police Chief, K. SIMMONS, #693, P. FONG, #3015 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
