Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 76
In Re: Tormu Prall
as 10-5058
Petitioner: Tormu E. Prall
Respondent: James E. Thomas, Cathryn Krinitsky and Stephen J. Miele
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 10-3714
Plaintiff - Appellant: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
In re: Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 10-3024
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: FREDA L. WOLFSON, U.S. District Judge
Prall v. Bush
as 10-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON BUSH
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In re: Tormu E. Prall
as 10-1572
Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, CITY OF BOSTON, JOHN DOES, a/k/a Unknown Named Boston Police Officers and others
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01228
Plaintiff: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01228
Plaintiff: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant: CHARLES ELLIS, PHYLLIS OLIVER, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Tormu Prall
as 10-1571
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
: JOHN J HUGHES
Prall v. Bush We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant: Christopher R. Bush
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Prall v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2010cv10058
Plaintiff: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant: City of Boston, John Does 1-99, John Moe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?