Cases 51 - 60 of 973
Howard v. Alabama Law Enforcement Agency et al
as 7:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, Hal Taylor, Mike Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trotter et al v. MTAH Enterprise, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Reena Trotter, Karina Griffen and Esther Hauss
Defendant:
MTAH Enterprise, LLC and Mary Tereza Aghasyan
TROTTER v. U.S. DEPT OF NAVY et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
LATASHA TROTTER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT OF NAVY and ADAM ALEXANDER EIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
DHANJAL v. TROTTER et al
as 3:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Jaswinder dhanjal
Defendant:
David Trotter and Michael Valasek
ScribeAmerica LLC et al v. ScribeNest LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
ScribeAmerica LLC and HealthChannels LLC
Defendant:
ScribeNest LLC, Sarah Chon, Lisa Williford and others
Griffin, Jr. et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
William E. Griffin, Jr. and P & G Construction Consultants LLC
Defendant:
Sergeant Scott Hunter, Lieutenant Shawn Williams, Tennessee Mutual Farmers Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trotter et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv21408
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Trotter and Nigel A Trotter
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
TROTTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06992
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TROTTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
