Cases 51 - 60 of 3,307
United States of America v. Wise
as 24-383
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WISE
Bey v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv04009
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bey
Defendant:
Dr. McClain, Dr. For Pafford, Sheriff James Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Singleton et al
as 4:2024cv04007
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bey
Defendant:
Sheriff James Singleton, Jail Administrator Wise, Lieutenant Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall Amplification Plc v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Marshall Amplification Plc
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Helloworld (Guangzhou) Import & Export Co., Ltd., Roma Technology (shengzhen) Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lyons v. Attebury et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Nathan Attebury, Kevin Johnson, L. Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Boose et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Dr. Boose, Sgt Bridwell, Sgt Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Amber Wise
as 24-5023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMBER J. WISE
USA v. Amber Wise
as 24-5024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMBER J. WISE
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
