Cases 51 - 60 of 123,856
SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SMITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
(PS) Winding v. Wahla et al
as 2:2024cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jacob Winding and Belinda Smith
Defendant:
Ifftikhar Wahla, Maria Bridges and Airhoster Short Term Rental Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Gooden v. Eaton et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Charles Gooden
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Steve Smith and C. Keo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Independent Order of Foresters
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Zenith Smith
Defendant:
The Independent Order of Foresters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Clophat et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jean Joseph Clophat and Inmate Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joseph et al
as 6:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Clophat Peun Joseph and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
