Cases 61 - 70 of 161
Johnson v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Lt. Kirskey and Sgt. Buchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adkins v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ernest A. Adkins
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Frank Albright, Alabama Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Houston County, Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Ressie Nicole Lee
Defendant:
Houston County, Alabama, Andy Hughes, Keith Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Houston County, Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Ressie Nicole Lee
Defendant:
Houston County, Alabama , Andy Hughes , Keith Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Hughes, et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00780
Plaintiff:
Danny Sanders
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Keith Reed and Kim Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feirick v. Hughes et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Feirick
Defendant:
Andy Hughes , Douglas A. Valeska and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Russaw v. Hughes et al(INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
Michael Russaw
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes, State of Alabama and Douglas Valeska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.