Cases 61 - 70 of 102,497
Hast v. Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Hast
Defendant:
Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC and Derrick Times
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pimental
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Pimental
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 183 Limitation of Liability
Winters v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 8:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Danielle Winters
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Experian Information Solutions Inc, an Ohio corporation v. Stein Saks, PLLC et al
as 8:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Experian Information Solutions Inc, an Ohio corporation
Defendant:
Stein Saks, PLLC, Judah Stein, Yaakov Saks and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weizenecker v. Benson et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Donald Allan Weizenecker
Defendant:
J. Benson, Charles Daniels, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel James Harper v. F. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
F. Flores and CSP Lancaster Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
