Cases 61 - 70 of 31,426
RAMOS v. RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06645
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arriaga et al v. McDermott International, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Anna Arriaga, Jonathan Bethancourt, Larry Bigelow and others
Defendant:
McDermott International Inc and C B & I L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alfaro v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Samantha Alfaro
Defendant:
City of Payson Police Department, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steimle et al v. Thompson
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Steimle and Azure Holding Group, LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Steimle, et al v. Thompson
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Steimle, and Azure Holding Group, LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-1482
Defendant:
DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sokolova v. City of New York
as 24-1487
Plaintiff:
TATIANA SOKOLOVA, guardian of Viacheslav Kargin
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, Captain HOWARD THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
