Cases 61 - 70 of 335
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY v. ADT LLC et al
as 1:2021cv19929
Defendant:
HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, ADT LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
DOTY et al v. ADT, LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00139
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02905
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Strange v. ADT LLC.
as 9:2021cv81818
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
ADT LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Signal Technology Foundation v. ADT LLC
as 5:2021cv07427
Plaintiff:
Signal Technology Foundation
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ashraf v. ADT, LLC
as 8:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Amad Ashraf
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ashraf v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
AMAD ASHRAF
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International
as 21-1581
Defendant / Appellee:
Royal Centurian Inc., ADT LLC, BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Sidik, as Administrator of the Estate of Kristen A. Sidik, deceased, as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.S., an Infant, as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.S., an Infant, Individually
Defendant:
Royal Sovereign Qingdao, AKA RS Qingdao, RS Ningbo, Inc. and Taishan City Kexinte Motor Products Co., LTD.
ADT LLC et al v. Vivint, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00687
Defendant:
Vivint, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
