Cases 61 - 70 of 83
RODRIGUEZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00786
Petitioner:
ARTURO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
RODRIGUEZ v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68309
Plaintiff:
ARTURO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RODRIGUEZ v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54788
Plaintiff:
ARTURO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Rodriguez-Rios v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv02070
Petitioner:
Arturo Rodriguez-Rios
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Arturo Rodriguez-Marquina v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70916
Petitioner:
ARTURO RODRIGUEZ-MARQUINA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Volero et al v. Tres Ceros Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv20080
Plaintiff:
Edith Volero , Arleni Sanchez , Alda Riviera and others
Defendant:
Tres Ceros Corporation and Arturo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
The Burlington Insurance Company v. Hilton Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00673
Defendant:
Guadalupe Amador Gomez, Santos Hernandez, Hilton Grill, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Burlington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodriguez-Martinez v. United States of America
as 7:2010cv00363
Plaintiff:
Luis Arturo Rodriguez-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reyes v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv05182
Petitioner:
Arturo Rodriguez Reyes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
